Prediction of Naomi Cheong vs Tatjana Stoll Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Cheong vs T. Stoll

Naomi Cheong

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

485

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tatjana Stoll

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

485

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Cheong 1 - 0 Stoll

They have played 2 sets in total, with Naomi Cheong winning 2 and Tatjana Stoll winning 0. The last match between Naomi Cheong and Tatjana Stoll was at the Darmstadt, 15-07-2018, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Naomi Cheong getting the victory 7-5 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cheong	1
Stoll	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Darmstadt(07-15-18)

Stats

Naomi Cheong

Tatjana Stoll

N. Cheong vs T. Stoll H2H Profile

N. Cheong	Stats	T. Stoll
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.79% (46-35)	Career Total W/L	22.34% (21-73)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Cheong vs T. Stoll Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naomi Cheong has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tatjana Stoll has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naomi Cheong, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatjana Stoll has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Naomi Cheong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatjana Stoll has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Naomi Cheong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tatjana Stoll winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Naomi Cheong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 27/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/4). Tatjana Stoll has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 16/52), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 3/14).
Player level: In the last year, Naomi Cheong has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tatjana Stoll has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naomi Cheong winning 1 times and Tatjana Stoll being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naomi Cheong winning 2 and Tatjana Stoll winning 0.
The last match between Naomi Cheong and Tatjana Stoll was at the Darmstadt, 15-07-2018, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Naomi Cheong getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naomi Cheong has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tatjana Stoll has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naomi Cheong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatjana Stoll has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Naomi Cheong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatjana Stoll has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Naomi Cheong vs Tatjana Stoll Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Cheong vs T. Stoll H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Cheong	Stats	T. Stoll
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Cheong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 Malibu - 13-01-2020
R1 Anna DanilinaA. Danilina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
W25 Tucson - 18-11-2019
R2 Marcela ZacariasM. Zacarias	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Hind AbdelouahidH. Abdelouahid	W	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Q3 Valentina IvanovV. Ivanov	W	6-7(4) 7-6(3) 10-6	Stats
Q1 Talya ZandbergT. Zandberg	W	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Stoll Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Darmstadt - 16-07-2018
Q1 Naomi CheongN. Cheong	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Aschaffenburg - 17-07-2017
Q1 Nicole GadientN. Gadient	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Versmold - 10-07-2017
Q2 Vivian HeisenV. Heisen	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Q1 Denise-Antonela StoicaD. Stoica	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Stuttgart-Vaihingen - 26-06-2017
Q1 Stephanie WagnerS. Wagner	L	7-5 6-1	Stats

View All

N. Cheong vs T. Stoll Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Cheong	Stats	T. Stoll
56.79% (46/35)	YTD Win/Loss	22.34% (21/73)
54.10% (99/84)	Sets Win/Loss	25.25% (51/151)
52.22% (859/786)	Games Win/Loss	39.03% (665/1039)
50.94% (27/26)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
50.00% (4/4)	Clay Win/Loss	23.53% (16/52)
75.00% (15/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	19.23% (5/21)
0.04	Aces Per Game	0
30	Aces Total	0
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0
190	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
508.06	Average Opponent Rank	357.14
57% (1561/2746)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
58% (911/1561)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
44% (522/1185)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
46% (166/359)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
46% (1245/2707)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
56.25% (36/28)	Challenger W/L	20.41% (10/39)
58.82% (10/7)	Futures W/L	24.44% (11/34)
57% (45/79)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	23% (21/93)
64% (7/11)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (4/8)
63% (15/24)	Deciding Set Win %	40% (6/15)
84% (44/37)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (23/18)
16% (44/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (23/5)
22% (36/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	4% (71/3)